Moto g4 play x moto g4 plus7/27/2023 Notifications toggle, dual-SIM, Dash Charging In everyday use, both phones locked onto the subjects quickly and are well suited for summer snaps. The Plus also boasts laser-assisted autofocus - something you won't find on the standard G4 - although in practice, I didn't really find much difference in the focusing times. Aside from the resolution, pictures from the G4 Plus look pretty much the same. The HDR mode (which stands for high dynamic range and is now typical on phone cameras) does a decent job evening the exposure, and the colours are generally vivid, with natural white balance.Ĭolour tones are natural, if perhaps slightly on the muted side, but overall, the images from the G4 look good. The G4's shots are mostly bright and well exposed, struggling only in scenes where there's a big difference between the bright sky and a shadowy ground. While there's a noticeable difference in resolution when you zoom in on details, if you only ever look at your snaps on your phone screen or on Instagram, you probably won't need the extra pixels. The standard Moto G4 comes with a 13-megapixel camera, which is a touch below the 16 megapixels of the G4 Plus. And without full contactless payment support, it feels rather underutilized. I really wish Moto had built in the ability to make it function as a home button, as well as a scanner. I regularly found myself pressing it to exit an app, which simply did nothing. My chief complaint, again, is that it does look like a physical home button, just like the ones you'd find on the Galaxy S7 or iPhone 6S. The fingerprint scanner on the front of the Plus is quick to set up and works very well, rarely failing to recognise my prints. In our processor benchmarking tests, they don't come even close to the mighty Samsung Galaxy S7, but at this price - basically a third of the Samsung - we don't expect them to. Gaming is adequate enough for a morning train or bus commute, but not robust enough for gamers. There's no annoying lag when you swipe around the home screens, the camera opens quickly and loading apps is very swift.īoth models come with octa-core processors, which are more than sufficient for your everyday social networking. That lack of bloatware helps the phone feel nippy and responsive. The interface is uncluttered, and aside from a single Motorola personalisation app, there's no messy bloatware. (Motorola will eventually offer a Moto G4 Play version too, which will have totally stock Android.) Many budget phone makers - I'm looking at you, Huawei - load their phones up with so much junk from the start that they're tough to navigate and find the essential features. The G4s run a near stock version of Google's Android 6.1 Marshmallow software, making them easy for even Android novices to use right out of the box. This is also where you can choose the amount of storage (16 or 32GB for the G4 16 (US), 32 (UK) or 64GB for the G4 Plus, with 4GB of RAM for that most capacious option). By comparison, the LG G5 took 12 hours 30 minutes, while the OnePlus 3 took 14 hours 17 minutes.Īs with the rest of the Moto family, you can select from a wide range of back panels and metallic accents using the online Moto Maker tool. On our looping video battery rundown test, it took 13 hours 20 minutes to drain the battery entirely, which is a respectable performance.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |